A real Apollo hero: Margaret Hamilton.
28 Mar '17 11:04http://iq.intel.com/margaret-hamilton-programmed-apollo-11-moon-landing/?cid=10877208&plid=148997897&crid=0&aid=320099318&sid=3229435&dclid=CIiylYOF-dICFQMNNwodZGcGfQ
28 Mar '17 15:39Originally posted by sonhouseWhy is it that I can't access these types of link? Do I copy it from the http bit or from somewhere else?
http://iq.intel.com/margaret-hamilton-programmed-apollo-11-moon-landing/?cid=10877208&plid=148997897&crid=0&aid=320099318&sid=3229435&dclid=CIiylYOF-dICFQMNNwodZGcGfQ
28 Mar '17 15:471 editOriginally posted by drewnogalI highlighted the whole thing and it worked for me. Highlight, control C, go to address line, highlight that, control V and it should pop up there, sometimes I have to hit cntl V twice to get the line in.
Why is it that I can't access these types of link? Do I copy it from the http bit or from somewhere else?
28 Mar '17 21:56Originally posted by sonhouseI had not realised until a friend told me but the alleged Apollo 11 landing was when thre moon was in its first quarter!
http://iq.intel.com/margaret-hamilton-programmed-apollo-11-moon-landing/?cid=10877208&plid=148997897&crid=0&aid=320099318&sid=3229435&dclid=CIiylYOF-dICFQMNNwodZGcGfQ
28 Mar '17 22:39Originally posted by wolfgang59Thinks that make you go...
I had not realised until a friend told me but the alleged Apollo 11 landing was when thre moon was in its first quarter!
Why choose a small target and make the job difficult?.
Also launch time was during the day when they couldn't even see their target!
Both these facts are verifiable.
Just DOES NOT MAKE SENSE.
28 Mar '17 23:021 editOriginally posted by wolfgang59"alleged Apollo 11 landing?" You must be a conspiracy theorist. And I thought only intelligent people played chess!
I had not realised until a friend told me but the alleged Apollo 11 landing was when thre moon was in its first quarter!
Why choose a small target and make the job difficult?.
Also launch time was during the day when they couldn't even see their target!
Both these facts are verifiable.
Just DOES NOT MAKE SENSE.
29 Mar '17 00:52 29 Mar '17 01:09Originally posted by JS357Follow the money...
At
http://www.skeptic.com/downloads/conspiracy-theories-who-why-and-how.pdf
There is a list of the top ten ways to tell if a conspiracy theory is likely to be bogus.
I would like to see the following potential theories tested:
A. Conspiracy: convince the population that there was a moon landing. The conspirators acted to convince the population t ...[text shortened]... r happened.
That the conspirators of theory A were more successful is not relevant. Or is it?
29 Mar '17 03:203 editsOriginally posted by wolfgang59Also the American flag fluttered in the wind, but...there's no wind on the moon, AND, it's clearly obvious from the photos that there are no stars in the lunar sky.
I had not realised until a friend told me but the alleged Apollo 11 landing was when thre moon was in its first quarter!
Why choose a small target and make the job difficult?.
Also launch time was during the day when they couldn't even see their target!
Both these facts are verifiable.
Just DOES NOT MAKE SENSE.
29 Mar '17 03:451 editOriginally posted by divegeesterNobody knows if there is wind on the moon or not.
Also the American flag fluttered in the wind, but...there's no wind on the moon, AND, it's clearly obvious from the photos that there are no starts in the Luna sky.
BOOM.
Back to Top