14 Nov '14 14:42>
Game 5 was drawn
Originally posted by ketchuploverAnd the livestream missed the last ten? moves..
Game 5 was drawn
Originally posted by Data FlyYes, even I spotted the knight move, although since I was going through the game on chessbase and could see the annotations I knew there was a problem. Apparently he moved the pawn quite quickly. I don't think it's all over though, there's only one game in it with 6 to go and I think Anand is capable of putting a missed opportunity behind him. He has to at least draw the next game though.
I can't believe Anand missed that. It was just so obvious. He's finished now.
Originally posted by greenpawn34There is a book with blunders for white :
..... All we do (or should do) is the White to play and win puzzles . How many
do a White to play and defend puzzle. (I cannot recall doing even one -
are there any White to play and blunder puzzles?).........
Originally posted by greenpawn34Until he blundered Carlsen was walking it, apparently the opinion of most GMs was that black's position was just plain bad. I wouldn't say it was a poor game, but I agree it's not one of the all time greats either.
Carlsen - Anand (game 6) Black to play.
[fen]6rr/1k3p2/1pb1p1np/p1p1P2R/2P3R1/2P1B3/P1BK1PP1/8 b - - 0 26[/fen]
I played a move in a serious OTB game that allowed a mate in one.
It was shrugged off. I just laughed and shook my head.
We are not schooled to defend and look at threats against us. For that we
rely heavily on a sense of danger. ( ...[text shortened]... ally one is enough. Not counting the severe blow to Carlsen's mind had Anand played it.} [/pgn]
Originally posted by Linden LyonsI haven't seen it, but the usual argument is that, at a high level, these are the openings which allow for the most imbalance (read: a proper fight) for the least danger. I don't doubt that at that level, it's true, too. That's also why, against d4, the King's Indian is more popular than the Queen's. (At my level, of course, I can blunder equally well in any opening.)
In the commentary, Peter Svidler apparently explained why one should play the Spanish Opening and the Sicilian Defence. Unfortunately, I missed his explanation. Could someone summarise it here? Thanks!
HELD Originally posted by Shallow BlueSo far, Maggy won the pawns and it is k, kn, R Vs K and rook. Is that a win?
I haven't seen it, but the usual argument is that, at a high level, these are the openings which allow for the most imbalance (read: a proper fight) for the least danger. I don't doubt that at that level, it's true, too. That's also why, against d4, the King's Indian is more popular than the Queen's. (At my level, of course, I can blunder equally well in any opening.)