08 Jun '17 20:04>
Serena all day long.
Her skill set is more transferable to table tennis.
Her skill set is more transferable to table tennis.
Originally posted by lemondropAh, but lemon.
I respectfully disagree
I still prefer the better athlete
Originally posted by Blood On The Tracksyup
Ah, but lemon.
You forget that you are totally ignorant of the skills needed to play ping pong, and show no willingness to learn them
I reckon knocking a little ball over a net with a little dimpled bat just about sums it up.
On a little 'court" or table.
With killer topspin, side spin, back spin, of course. Make that little ball misbehave.
Originally posted by lemondropOne rather likes your respect,......though not your reasoning.
I respectfully disagree
I still prefer the better athlete
Originally posted by Ghost of a Dukeyou sure 2 CHAMPIONS at ping pong?
One rather likes your respect,......though not your reasoning.
Michael Phelps is probably a better athlete than both, but I wouldn't trust him at wiff waff.
Edit: And how many professional baseball players have also been world champion at table tennis? (I can name at least 2 tennis players who have done so. - There is no coincidence in that).
Originally posted by Ghost of a Dukethe question was not whether curry or serena would become top pros in table tennis but rather which would win a tables tennis match between the two
One rather likes your respect,......though not your reasoning.
Michael Phelps is probably a better athlete than both, but I wouldn't trust him at wiff waff.
Edit: And how many professional baseball players have also been world champion at table tennis? (I can name at least 2 tennis players who have done so. - There is no coincidence in that).
Originally posted by lemondropAgreed, lemon.
the question was not whether curry or serena would become top pros in table tennis but rather which would win a tables tennis match between the two
I think a tennis professional has a more narrow skill set then a pro basketball player or baseball player
The post that was quoted here has been removedWhat you actually wrote (top of p2) is 'there is hardly a statistical correlation'. Did you check that? Are you basing this latest liar attack on the fact that I took that to be 'no correlation'?? Weak.