(oops now I have started 2 threads... I really didn't mean to do this so please don't start on me . ok )
If you're talking about voluntary euthanasia, then I'm all for it. It should be solely the decision of the individual, so long as they are not incapacitated or have let their wishes be known via a living will.
Originally posted by ThinkOfOne If you're talking about voluntary euthanasia, then I'm all for it. It should be solely the decision of the individual, so long as they are not incapacitated or have let their wishes be known via a living will.
What about you?
In a scenario like in the movie "Million Dollar Baby" I believe "Yes". Yes it is the humane thing to do
Originally posted by josephw In those situations I would imagine the next step is for those who think they know best would decide who has the right to live or die.
Hitler would be a good example.
No Joe, Hitler would be a bad example, and by recognised internet protocol, mention of Hitler automatically loses you the argument.
Example:
Peter. "I don't like cats."
Joe. "That sounds like something Hitler would say."
Originally posted by josephw In those situations I would imagine the next step is for those who think they know best would decide who has the right to live or die.
Hitler would be a good example.
Doesn't seem like you've follow my discussion with KA. Perhaps you should read it again.