1. Standard memberChessPraxis
    Cowboy From Hell
    American West
    Joined
    19 Apr '10
    Moves
    55013
    09 Jul '14 00:25
    Originally posted by 1shooter
    what if its a chess search engine?

    Is that different from a search engine or a chess engine.

    geez some many titles for what is obvious. Seems like your playing fisher random with the words here.
    search engine:
    https://www.google.com
    chess engine:
    http://www.shredderchess.com/play-chess-online.html

    I think you meant "you're playing" and I am not the one using wrong terms here. Just because you call a dandelion a rose doesn't make it red and prettier. 😕
  2. Joined
    17 Dec '13
    Moves
    962
    09 Jul '14 02:46
    no but we both know we would be talking about a flower in that context.
  3. Joined
    11 Mar '13
    Moves
    8439
    09 Jul '14 06:582 edits
    Hello guys!

    I think it is better to explain how chess programs work.

    Parts of a Chess program:

    a) Graphic Interface (GUI): it is the window that contains the board and pieces and the list of moves of the game. It is only used to show information to the user.

    b) Engine: it is a small program in itself, you could run some of these in a command line (do you remember old D.O.S. programs?).
    What is inside the engine?
    -There is a set of data structures for representing the board, the list of pieces and a tree for containing the positions to be analyzed.
    -The evaluation function that it is going to give a give a value to each position depending of the move that originated it (MinMax algorithm).
    -A lot of algorithms: for generating the moves to be evaluated, alpha-beta pruning for removing the "bad" moves from the tree of positions.
    -Permanent Brain: the engine can analyze while the adversary is thinking.
    -Communication Protocol: this lets the GUI to communicate with the engine.
    UCI is a very popular protocol.

    c) Opening Tree (or opening book): for those that have chessbase products, you are going to find a file *.cbt, this file has all the right moves the engine can use. It is interesting to note that some moves have a ?. This is because it is a bad move or this move is going to lead to a close position where the full power of the engine can't not be used. The engine starts analyzing when it can't find more moves in the opening book.

    d) Endgame Data Base: Nalimov tablebases probably the most well known.
    This can show you the result of the ending and what is the list of moves to achieve the optimal result.

    When you buy a Chessbase product, you get the Fritz GUI and one of the engines (Fritz, Houdini or any other). And this is the tricky part, when you have a GUI, you can download any free engine from the internet and make it work in your computer.

    Do you need to spend a lot of money?
    No, there are some free GUI in the net, one of the best GUI is Arena.

    There are some free "old" versions of: Houdini, Komodo, even the last
    Stockfish version (the winner of the last TCEC season 5 2014) is already out.

    Cool things to do with engines:

    -Organize your own engine tournament. You can even set up the position you want them to start playing.

    -Analyze old classical games:
    Could Fischer draw the first game against Spassky in 1972?
    What about Botvinnik vs. Bronstein? Botvinnik was a rook up!!!
    Could Short win one more game against Kasparov?

    -Solve some chess problems by yourself and compare the solutions.

    Why am I explaining all this?
    I believe all the people have the right to get the tools now available to improve their skills.
    What is not right is to use these tools to take advantage of your adversary.

    For those interested in programming an engine, Stockfish and Fruit source code is available.
    They were written using C/C++.

    Good sources of information:
    -Robert Hyatt (Crafty programmer) online documents
    -The Chess Programming Wiki.

    I have seen the Fruit source code and looks very neat, well organized.
    Parts of Fruit were used to create the now "banned" Ribka.

    Hope you have a nice day! 🙂

    PD: Programming a chess engine is a serious commitment, if you want to make a really good one, you will probably have to write more than 2000 lines of code. And I am not talking about all the hours invested in the project (coding, debugging, testing, optimizing, etc).
  4. Standard memberISK
    God Emperor
    Fraggle Rock
    Joined
    02 Oct '05
    Moves
    3592
    10 Jul '14 15:21
    Hmmm, is reading chess books for 35 years, both method and openings concidered cheating?
  5. SubscriberC J Horse
    A stable personality
    Near my hay.
    Joined
    27 Apr '06
    Moves
    64141
    10 Jul '14 17:37
    Originally posted by ISK
    Hmmm, is reading chess books for 35 years, both method and openings concidered cheating?
    Of course not. What do you mean?

    You can read as many chess books for as long as you like, but they won't make you play like a computer.
  6. Standard memberBigDogg
    Secret RHP coder
    on the payroll
    Joined
    26 Nov '04
    Moves
    155080
    10 Jul '14 17:50
    Originally posted by ISK
    Hmmm, is reading chess books for 35 years, both method and openings concidered cheating?
    Nope. In corr. chess, you can break open as many books as you like. Even during the game. Them's the rules.
  7. Standard memberfishplant
    Blundermeister
    Southport
    Joined
    20 Apr '06
    Moves
    10975
    10 Jul '14 19:45
    I think Ragwort said it best when he said, "So now I play with the attitude that my opponents only purpose is to provide a move against which to test my chess skill and understanding at the level of effort and application I wish to apply to the game."

    I don't like the idea of people sneakily using engines, but if they had a little flag by their name that said, "I use performance enhancing engines," I would still play them when drawn against them in a tournament. I'm here to improve my game - I don't care if these guys are being told what to do by a machine (although I do think it's a bit weird, and wonder what their motivation is, and whether they exercise any control over any other part of their lives, or just submissively accept what any machine tells them).

    If it became the majority of RHP users I'd rethink; I could just buy some chess software of my own to play against. But while it's (I believe) a small minority, I'm happy to play on.
  8. Standard memberISK
    God Emperor
    Fraggle Rock
    Joined
    02 Oct '05
    Moves
    3592
    15 Jul '14 16:35
    Cheers BigDogg,

    Cleared that up for me thanks, and yes.. I play wth about 10 books open 🙂
  9. Joined
    12 Jan '04
    Moves
    68830
    11 Aug '14 06:18
    Originally posted by ChessPraxis
    Are you suggesting coconuts migrate? 😕
    No, but certain swallows do...
  10. Account suspended
    Joined
    10 Dec '11
    Moves
    143494
    11 Aug '14 14:16
    Originally posted by ISK
    Cheers BigDogg,

    Cleared that up for me thanks, and yes.. I play wth about 10 books open 🙂
    Same in my case, 10 also, of which 5 are dictionaries, 1 is cook book, and 1 is Nabokov's novel Luzhin's Defense.
  11. Wat?
    Joined
    16 Aug '05
    Moves
    76863
    11 Aug '14 16:10
    Originally posted by radicalcpp
    Hello guys!

    I think it is better to explain how chess programs work.

    Parts of a Chess program:

    a) Graphic Interface (GUI): it is the window that contains the board and pieces and the list of moves of the game. It is only used to show information to the user.

    b) Engine: it is a small program in itself, you could run some of these in a command l ...[text shortened]... lking about all the hours invested in the project (coding, debugging, testing, optimizing, etc).
    No wonder you stuffed me in our last 2 games. 😲
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree