09 Sep '15 14:21>
Arcangelo Ricciardi... Apparently been a very naughty boy.
Originally posted by greenpawn34Which brings up questions about people who blog for RHP? 😛
It turns out he was not cheating at all.
He was using the camera in the pendant to set up a live feed to his blog.
Originally posted by greenpawn34I had to use an engine to help me out. If the Beekeeper found the move that my engine found (after about 30 seconds thought) then he is, without doubt, a dirty rotten cheat!
Qc3 and Nc4, are good moves. The Beekeeper found another move given as best by the computers.
See if you can figure out what it may be and then do you think an 1829 player would have rejected the other two and played this.
Originally posted by Data FlyBecause it allows an uncontested N-e4 queen check? Don't see what that does right now.
I had to use an engine to help me out. If the Beekeeper found the move that my engine found (after about 30 seconds thought) then he is, without doubt, a dirty rotten cheat!
[hidden]g4!![/hidden]
However I'm not sure if that is 100% proof - not on one move just because I never saw it.Absolutely. Say someone like Wei Yi, or Vladislav Artemiev, the 17 year old Russian rated 2675 started playing a little better, no one would think anything of it. He (or someone like him) could get away with a rather steep improvement.
If a 2600 player played it, nobody would be suspicious. That is where is the danger lay.
Good players using devices.[/b]