1. Joined
    22 Jun '08
    Moves
    8801
    01 Mar '15 01:341 edit
    Originally posted by vivify
    A .45 is so much cooler, but a 9 mm is more practical.
    A .45 cal is too large for normal self defense, the bullet will travel through the victim.... I assume we are talking self defense here? In most cases a 9mm would do fine.
    I like the 40 cal, because I do travel where there is game that is too large for a 9mm.
    One also has to account for the larger cal kick.. not the caliber for a normal woman,, many men flinch shooting them in anticipation of the recoil.
    Bottom line, what ever you chose,, you have to use.. like spend time at the range.
    In comparison between my 9mm and my 40 cal, shooting at a round target made from 1/8 mild steel, not on a solid mount, a 9mm will put a nice dent in the plate at 25ft, enough to knock a man off his feet wearing a vest.. My 40 cal comes just short of punching through it..you can see daylight thru the impact area. and I know that would stop a man in a vest, and break ribs. All of my long guns will shoot through the plate.
  2. Standard memberAThousandYoung
    Insanity at Masada
    tinyurl.com/mw7txe34
    Joined
    23 Aug '04
    Moves
    26660
    01 Mar '15 01:41
    Originally posted by FishHead111
    Been dropping tanks out of planes for a long time:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airdrop#mediaviewer/File:C-130_airdrop.jpg
    Nope. An Abrams can't even fit into a C130 much less be dropped by one.

    Sheridans and Strykers aren't real tanks.
  3. Joined
    22 Jun '08
    Moves
    8801
    01 Mar '15 01:45
    Originally posted by normbenign
    Auto pistols are for close range work. Heavy bullets, low velocity, .45 rules.

    Cooper oversimplifies, but he does make a point. More capacity doesn't help, if you can't hit your target. No1, Paraordnance makes a .45 with a 14 round double stack magazine, stead of the old 7 rounders for the traditional 1911 .45ACP. Navy Seals like the other German . ...[text shortened]... with consistently, and quickly, and that is light and compact enough so that you will carry it.
    I agree with what you say, in particular,, you have to hit the target, or it doesn't matter what caliber you're shooting. And unless you have had the unfortunate opportunity of shooting at a real person,, I don't think many will appreciate the added stress in the situation, especially if it can shoot back.
  4. SubscriberSuzianne
    Misfit Queen
    Isle of Misfit Toys
    Joined
    08 Aug '03
    Moves
    36645
    01 Mar '15 16:32
    Originally posted by no1marauder
    Screw them shooting sideways wannabes.

    The Colt M1911 .45 is an American classic. Only someone who hates this country would prefer a wimpy 9 mm.
    Or a woman, who might find a .45 knocking her on her own ass.

    A .380, or even better, a 9mm, which rounds down to a .354, is a better choice for her.
  5. Joined
    18 Jan '07
    Moves
    12457
    01 Mar '15 17:00
    Originally posted by AThousandYoung
    Do you speak Russian yet?
    Nope.

    And thanks to Dutch aid in your rebellion, you don't speak English any more, so stop being an idiot.
  6. Standard memberno1marauder
    Naturally Right
    Somewhere Else
    Joined
    22 Jun '04
    Moves
    42677
    01 Mar '15 17:07
    Originally posted by Hugh Glass
    Or a charging grizzly bear, where you need to beak a shoulder to stop it.. a 9mm would be grossly under powered.
    Then you have to be good enough to hit a target moving faster than a 1/4 horse in 30 yds over uneven terrain..
    And ole Anal one I am in doubt of your ability to hit a paper target. Let alone something moving to kill your arse.
    Please give me an example of a person who shot a charging grizzly bear with a pistol using more than a 10 round mag.

    Thanks.
  7. Standard memberno1marauder
    Naturally Right
    Somewhere Else
    Joined
    22 Jun '04
    Moves
    42677
    01 Mar '15 17:08
    Originally posted by Suzianne
    Or a woman, who might find a .45 knocking her on her own ass.

    A .380, or even better, a 9mm, which rounds down to a .354, is a better choice for her.
    The kick isn't that bad if you're ready for it. A two hand grip and you should be fine.
  8. Standard memberAThousandYoung
    Insanity at Masada
    tinyurl.com/mw7txe34
    Joined
    23 Aug '04
    Moves
    26660
    01 Mar '15 17:202 edits
    Originally posted by Shallow Blue
    Nope.

    And thanks to Dutch aid in your rebellion, you don't speak English any more, so stop being an idiot.
    I'm Spanish (Californio) you fool. Kneel before your rightful masters, Felipe y Francis!

    PS Lol @ New Netherlands becoming New England
  9. Account suspended
    Joined
    02 Jan '15
    Moves
    10189
    01 Mar '15 18:08
    Originally posted by no1marauder
    Please give me an example of a person who shot a charging grizzly bear with a pistol using more than a 10 round mag.

    Thanks.
    Couldn't find anything on google but having read many guns & hunting magazines over a 30 year period I've read of several instances where a grizzly bear was shot 8 or 10 times with a high power rifle before stopping, and I'm sure there are many more I haven't heard of.
  10. Standard membervivify
    rain
    Joined
    08 Mar '11
    Moves
    12351
    01 Mar '15 18:191 edit
    Anyone here own or ever shot a Magnum? Or maybe shot a .44 Magnum?
  11. Account suspended
    Joined
    02 Jan '15
    Moves
    10189
    01 Mar '15 19:321 edit
    Originally posted by vivify
    Anyone here own or ever shot a Magnum? Or maybe shot a .44 Magnum?
    Of course. I've owned half a dozen and shot many more that friends owned.

    How can you NOT have ever owned or shot a .357-41-44 Magnum revolver?
  12. Standard memberAThousandYoung
    Insanity at Masada
    tinyurl.com/mw7txe34
    Joined
    23 Aug '04
    Moves
    26660
    01 Mar '15 20:00
    Originally posted by FishHead111
    Couldn't find anything on google but having read many guns & hunting magazines over a 30 year period I've read of several instances where a grizzly bear was shot 8 or 10 times with a high power rifle before stopping, and I'm sure there are many more I haven't heard of.
    That's probably because the rifleman shot the clueless bear in the butt from max range...which is NOT "self defense against a charging grizzly".
  13. Account suspended
    Joined
    02 Jan '15
    Moves
    10189
    01 Mar '15 20:08
    Originally posted by AThousandYoung
    That's probably because the rifleman shot the clueless bear in the butt from max range...which is NOT "self defense against a charging grizzly".
    Uhhh.....no.
    Just....no.
    It's obvious you have never hunted or studied/read anything about hunting large dangerous game animals, or of people that have been attacked by a Grizzly Bear because they surprised one in the wilderness.
  14. Subscribermwmiller
    RHP Member No.16
    Joined
    25 Feb '01
    Moves
    101392
    01 Mar '15 20:11
    Here's a cut and paste from an article that is a few years old now. This guy didn't have a high-capacity magazine or even use a handgun, but it sounds like he would have liked to have had a few more rounds....

    "Rochester Man Survives Charge by Grizzly

    Posted by admin | Filed under Hunting

    By Tony Pannkuk
    For The Chronicle

    For one Rochester man, a Wyoming excursion to hunt mule deer turned into a close encounter with a charging grizzly bear.

    Joel Swecker, 29, son of state Sen. Dan Swecker, was hunting out of Powell, Wyo., near the southern border of Montana in late October, with Brandon Betts and Isaac Garza, co-workers from West Thurston Fire Authority.

    The three hunters would head out each morning before daylight in search of mule deer. On the fourth day of the hunt, Oct. 24, they chose to split up after hunting together for the past three days. Deer were plentiful as they saw around 35 deer per day while covering the mountainous region of the Shoshone National Forest, bordering Yellowstone National Park. However, all bucks spotted were either spikes or two points, and wanting to bag a bigger trophy, they chose not to shoot any of the smaller bucks.

    The trio had seen several grizzlies, and ranch hands had warned them that the bears were hungry, as their food source was low at this time of year. After walking in several miles the hunters split up. Garza headed south to a ridge that went above where Swecker would be hunting. Betts went north following an old service road while Swecker went right up the middle following a trail that went straight up to a pass with rock cliffs on both sides.

    The three hunters were in an area the local residents called Cap and Ball, which looked like a baseball field that ended with a 2,000-foot rock face several hundred yards farther up the draw.

    The rock face, called “Wolverine Rock,” was located at the edge of the wilderness area.

    Entering the Cap and Ball area, Swecker spotted three deer, including a buck, about 400 yards in front of him.

    He spotted an old burnt out stump and a fallen old growth tree lying near the middle of the Cap and Ball field. Climbing onto the downed tree he took out his binoculars and started scanning for the deer. Through the lenses, the cliffs and mesas grew clearer, as he scanned the area for several minutes.

    He put down his binoculars and as any hunter would do, he looked behind him. To his amazement he spotted a grizzly silently coming his way. At 70 feet away the bear had its head down and appeared to be making eye contact. Swecker noticed the grizzly had scar marks on its face and nose. Watching the grizzly, Swecker first thought the bear didn’t know he was there. With a strong breeze blowing to the grizzly, Swecker could see its nose working as it kept coming in his direction. Swecker brought up his 30-06 and found the monster in his scope. All he could see was a big patch of brown. At 50 feet away and still coming, Swecker knew he had to do something. He was now getting worried, so he made a swishing sound a couple of times to get the grizzly’s attention. He brought up his rifle, waving it in the air, and hollered “Hey, Hey” a couple of times. To Swecker’s utter disbelief, the bear made a woof sound and started sprinting towards him.

    Within what seemed like seconds, the grizzly was only 20 feet away and had jumped over a log coming straight for Swecker. The grizzly was now at a full run.

    Swecker had his rifle at his hip and wanted to scare it by shooting a warning shot. As he pulled the trigger, he knew it is illegal to shoot grizzlies in the lower 48 and was hoping the shot would scare the bear away.

    At the shot, the grizzly gave a blood-curdling, screaming growl and stood up on its hind legs. Swecker saw the shot had inadvertently hit the grizzly in the chest and penetrating through the sternum to the belly.

    The shot opened it up like a hunter preparing to take out the entrails.

    Growling and with its massive jaws snapping, the grizzly started biting where the bullet had entered his body. To Swecker, it was like some macabre slow-motion movie.

    At one point, the mad grizzly had hooked its intestines across its nose as it was biting at itself. The grizzly dropped on all fours, growling intensely and charged at Swecker again.

    Eyes wide, Swecker shot from the hip again, this time missing the charging grizzly. At that point self-preservation took over, because Swecker does not remember ejecting the spent cartridge and sliding a new shell in the chamber.

    With the grizzly now only 15 steps away, Swecker knew he had to make the next shot count or the grizzly would be on him in two or three seconds.

    He knew he had only three shots loaded in his rifle and his last shot was in the chamber. Knowing the scope was useless, he looked down the barrel and pulled the trigger.

    He hit the charging, wounded and crazed grizzly just above the right eye. The grizzly spun in a circle and dropped to the ground.

    The extreme danger he had just encountered suddenly hit him, and he began shaking. His heart pounded and everything seemed to proceed in silence for several minutes.

    He searched the dappled forest floor where the grizzly laid looking for any movement. His gaze locked on the downed beast that could have so easily taken his life instead of the other way around.

    After getting his thoughts together, he called Betts and Garza on his portable radio. Both had heard his shots but assumed he was shooting at a mule deer.

    There had been seven encounters with grizzlies in 2010 in Wyoming and Montana, causing the death of one hunter. After reaching the K Bar Z Ranch, Swecker called the game department, which sent out two game wardens who took the incident report and possession of the dead grizzly.

    Montana Game Warden Chris Queen, one of the officers who had interviewed Swecker, told me that he forwarded the reports to federal authorities and no information about the incident could be released until the case is adjudicated.

    Comments (0) | January 20th, 2011 "
  15. Account suspended
    Joined
    02 Jan '15
    Moves
    10189
    01 Mar '15 20:15
    Originally posted by mwmiller
    Here's a cut and paste from an article that is a few years old now. This guy didn't have a high-capacity magazine or even use a handgun, but it sounds like he would have liked to have had a few more rounds....

    "Rochester Man Survives Charge by Grizzly

    Posted by admin | Filed under Hunting

    By Tony Pannkuk
    For The Chronicle

    For one Rochester man ...[text shortened]... incident could be released until the case is adjudicated.

    Comments (0) | January 20th, 2011 "
    Yep...you got a Grizzly charging you ya want a machine gun.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree