Please turn on javascript in your browser to play chess.
Debates Forum
Joined 25 Jun '06 Moves 64930 Originally posted by Wajoma
I gave my explanation already:
"Those that use the term wish to assign a value for something on behalf of others whether they like it or not'
Your response was:
"Generally you are wrong...as always, you appear to have the notion that language is a game you can play by your own rules."
I called you on it, invited you to explain your distinction, un ...[text shortened]... ever be".
"Substantial" sources indeed.
Time to put the bib on and eat some crow Finnegan. A wise old owl sat in an oak
The more he saw the less he spoke
The less he spoke the more he heard.
Why can't we all be like that wise old bird? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Wise_Old_Owl
Provocation
Joined 01 Sep '04 Moves 78042 Originally posted by AThousandYoung
Fraud The initiators of force and threats of force are not owed the truth.
Germany
Joined 27 Oct '08 Moves 3118 Originally posted by Wajoma
The initiators of force and threats of force are not owed the truth. Back to anarchism again, are we?
tinyurl.com/mw7txe34
Joined 23 Aug '04 Moves 26660 Originally posted by Wajoma
The initiators of force and threats of force are not owed the truth. Typical capitalist logic. Tax fraud is OK because it is not real fraud and you still expect the police to initiate force to protect your private property.
Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More . I Agree