18 Mar '17 16:20>
Originally posted by josephwDon't blame me for your poor expression.
That's because you lost the meaning and intent of the thread by screwing up what I said so badly replying with completely erroneous statements.
For example: I asked, 'is it not true that at any given moment everything in existence is precisely where it should be'? To which you replied, "It is not known to be true that everything is where it is due to non-arbitrary laws."
Who said it was? You twisted it up. You're either lying or you're too ignorant to understand plain English.
There was nothing 'plain' about your english. I even had to ask for clarification which you gave, and I answered with the best of my ability based on your answer. Accusing me of lying or ignorance in this instance is uncalled for.
It's just too simple for you isn't it? Everything in existence is as it is because of design, and would cease to exist as it is if and when that design changes.
It's a no-brainer.
If it is such a no-brainer, then why can't you explain it better and explain what you think I lied about? It doesn't make sense to me, and what little I thought I understood from what you said, I strongly disagree with. Calling me a liar and simply repeating your claim without explanation doesn't help.