Originally posted by moonbus
I think by "put" he meant "in orbit." But I could be wrong (he may have meant something else).
Yes, I know. But he tends to be very vague with his claims whilst simultaneously using the word 'exactly'. The fact is that the moons orbit varies significantly over time and he is well aware of that fact as he has been told so many many many times in this thread.
The real problem is he came to this thread having read on some creationist website that the eclipses were evidence for design but he didn't bother to check what they were actually claiming so he made an utter fool of himself from the very beginning. Its not much different from the spirituality thread where someone claimed the banana was evidence of design without doing even a basic Google search which would have revealed that the banana is a man made product actually IS designed - but by man, not God.
Cheney's problem is he can't admit when he's wrong. Instead he gets more and more ridiculous.
The original claim (that Cheney stole from some creationist website) has to do with two things:
1. the distances of the moon and sun result in the moon appearing similar in size to the sun and thus eclipses occasionally result in an almost perfect fit. What the creationists in question didn't know was that more often than not, the fit is not perfect.
2. speculation by some scientists that the moons existence and orbit was necessary or beneficial to life. However, the exactness of its orbit was never seriously considered to be special by any sane scientist.
But Cheney doesn't actually understand either claim yet is trying desperately to defend them.