22 Apr '17 14:43>
Originally posted by humyYou are a liar and calling me one without merit is not going to make it so.
I said no such thing. I said wiki is sometimes wrong; That doesn't mean to say wiki isn't right for about 99.99% of the time. I would say that makes it reasonably reliable. So you lie again.
and now you cite that very unreliable source as your so called proof?????
Firstly, wiki's word isn't absolute proof and I never claimed it was.
You mu ...[text shortened]... e long thus you admit you were lying all along and I was telling the truth all along; thank you.
Find another source of info. I suspect you cannot do that, which explains why you keep going back to wikipedia. You have no idea what it takes to be a climate scientist. If you could have proved anything you would have by now. All you had to do is show that all climate scientists are climatologists to prove your assertion right. You have failed miserably to do that despite your best efforts.
Your deception is transparent.