13 Oct '16 20:48>
There is a difference between alleged consensus of climate scientists believing man is the "primary cause" of global warming and an actual poll of climate scientists showing a consensus of "primary cause".
http://www.forbes.com/sites/alexepstein/2015/01/06/97-of-climate-scientists-agree-is-100-wrong/2/#16f28cb926d6
When people claim a climate scientist believes man is the "primary cause" of global warming and write a paper on it only for that climate scientist to say that is not what he was saying in his study it is stupid to claim that is proof of anything.
When a respected climate scientist writes a paper saying there is no poll to suggest climate scientists believe man is the "primary cause" of global warming and not even one climate scientist disputes it I think it is very likely Fred Singer knows what he is talking about.
http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2014/02/climate_consensus_con_game.html
I have had it with liars like humy claiming a poll exists showing climate scientists believe man is the "primary cause" of global warming. He can show us a poll without "primary cause" or a poll of people who are not climate scientists but that is a failure. They have to be climate scientist, not just scientists. Primary cause is important too. Showing man is a mere factor is not enough. Even Fred Singer himself does not deny man is a factor and he is regarded as a skeptic.
I challenge anyone to prove what Humy, Sonhouse, Kazetnaggora and Googlefudge have failed to do on multiple occasions, but use facts and not mere claims without sources of information provided. This is a science forum, not a myth forum.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/alexepstein/2015/01/06/97-of-climate-scientists-agree-is-100-wrong/2/#16f28cb926d6
When people claim a climate scientist believes man is the "primary cause" of global warming and write a paper on it only for that climate scientist to say that is not what he was saying in his study it is stupid to claim that is proof of anything.
When a respected climate scientist writes a paper saying there is no poll to suggest climate scientists believe man is the "primary cause" of global warming and not even one climate scientist disputes it I think it is very likely Fred Singer knows what he is talking about.
http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2014/02/climate_consensus_con_game.html
I have had it with liars like humy claiming a poll exists showing climate scientists believe man is the "primary cause" of global warming. He can show us a poll without "primary cause" or a poll of people who are not climate scientists but that is a failure. They have to be climate scientist, not just scientists. Primary cause is important too. Showing man is a mere factor is not enough. Even Fred Singer himself does not deny man is a factor and he is regarded as a skeptic.
I challenge anyone to prove what Humy, Sonhouse, Kazetnaggora and Googlefudge have failed to do on multiple occasions, but use facts and not mere claims without sources of information provided. This is a science forum, not a myth forum.