06 Mar '17 09:37>2 edits
I don't follow the pro chess stuff by I was interested to read that a result had been overturned. The San Jose Hackers vs Las Vegas Desert Rats match has been affected due to fair play violations. Here is some statistical analysis that someone else has done. I cannot vouch for its veracity but I wonder if anyone knows is there is anything significant in the statistics I cannot see it myself.
GM Timur Gareyev (FIDE 2617, FIDE rapid 2615) : 387 undecided positions, correlation scores : T1=43.9%, T2=67%, T3=78.3%, blunder rate = 3,88%, acl = 16.77
FM Elliott Liu (FIDE 2284) : 285 pos, T-scores : 42.6% 57.2% 68.2%, br=5.26%, acl=17.26
GM Kayden Troff (FIDE 2511) : 675 pos, T-scores : 39.6% 63.2% 70.7%, br=4.44%, acl=17.26
GM Jacek Stopa (FIDE 2453, FIDE rapid 2511) : 191 pos, T-scores : 39.1% 60.1% 79.8%, br=5.24%, acl=16.88
GM Timur Gareyev (FIDE 2617, FIDE rapid 2615) : 387 undecided positions, correlation scores : T1=43.9%, T2=67%, T3=78.3%, blunder rate = 3,88%, acl = 16.77
FM Elliott Liu (FIDE 2284) : 285 pos, T-scores : 42.6% 57.2% 68.2%, br=5.26%, acl=17.26
GM Kayden Troff (FIDE 2511) : 675 pos, T-scores : 39.6% 63.2% 70.7%, br=4.44%, acl=17.26
GM Jacek Stopa (FIDE 2453, FIDE rapid 2511) : 191 pos, T-scores : 39.1% 60.1% 79.8%, br=5.24%, acl=16.88