1. Joined
    19 Aug '16
    Moves
    91
    28 Nov '16 06:55


    I played this over at chess.com tonight. I remember somewhere vaguely that there is a name for a move that forces a defending piece to move. Of course, white's 24th move wasn't really forced.
  2. Subscriberjb70
    State of Confusion
    Lancashire
    Joined
    04 May '08
    Moves
    842388
    28 Nov '16 07:47
    Deflection or Decoy?
    Jeno Ban had easier terms to understand: driving off and driving on depending on if you are pushing an opponent's piece off a square or on to a square.
    In your case it is driving off.
    Is that deflection?
  3. Account suspended
    Joined
    10 Dec '11
    Moves
    143494
    28 Nov '16 11:08
    There is a name in theory of combination::: Serbian word is "odvlačenje", I think English translation might be
    dragging off (an opponent's piece) - Queen was dragged off so that She can't defend square "h3".
  4. e4
    Joined
    06 May '08
    Moves
    42492
    28 Nov '16 11:471 edit
    "Is there a name for black's 23 move?"

    it is called 23....Re4 🙂

    ----------

    Hi Mate19,

    jb70 has it spot on a Deflecting Sacrifice. The White Queen is deflected from defending h3.



    23....Re4 24.Qxe4 Qxh3 mate.

    You are correct White is not forced to take e4, I bet he was expecting 23...Rec8
    and too quickly dismissed 23...Re4 as an error, though his position is still very bleak.

    Two things to note.


    Black played 13...Bxc3 here. Always a dodgy move taking a c3 Knight with a g7 Bishop
    especially if, as here, White still has their DSB on the board. White could have played
    14.dxc6 which gives White all the winning chances. Black I'm sure will have to give
    up at least the exchange for the c6 pawn after cxb7.

    Back to the mate.


    In that set up a Rook on h3 also mates. There was no way of forcing it in
    the actual game but a handy mating pattern worth knowing.

    sbacat - wadanz RHP 2016


  5. Joined
    12 Jul '08
    Moves
    13814
    28 Nov '16 18:20
    White didn't have to take, so maybe it should be called offering a chance to white to make a bad move.

    Unless I am mistaking white could have moved the queen to f3 or g3.

    Maybe I'm missing something. Not saying it would have made things turn out any differently.
  6. Joined
    12 Jul '08
    Moves
    13814
    28 Nov '16 21:15
    Was 19.g5 as bad as I think it looks?
  7. Standard memberDeepThought
    Losing the Thread
    Quarantined World
    Joined
    27 Oct '04
    Moves
    87415
    30 Nov '16 00:30
    Originally posted by Eladar
    Was 19.g5 as bad as I think it looks?
    Yes, it totally buries the bishop.
  8. Joined
    19 Aug '16
    Moves
    91
    30 Nov '16 01:57
    Thx guys. I appreciate the input.
  9. Standard memberDeputy Daddy
    Willing to Learn
    New Hampshire
    Joined
    19 Nov '16
    Moves
    1327
    30 Nov '16 04:30
    Would it be called baiting or the "legal trap"

    http://m.wikihow.com/Fool-Your-Opponent-in-Chess
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree