28 Sep '16 15:30>7 edits
Originally posted by no1maraudera) You're a hypocrite for accusing anyone of hair-splitting, since you're notorious for it.
I see no difference in saying an approximate figure is a "reasonable estimate" and saying it was "accurate". That you are reduced to such hair splitting shows how weak your claim is.
The State Department has neither confirmed or denied Hillary's statement.
Your foot stamping is amusing but you've added nothing here to the discussion in the other th ...[text shortened]... ely so with intent to deceive. Therefore you have not met your burden of showing it to be a lie.
b) Reasonable assumptions aren't the same as accurate statements. Assuming the sun revolved around the earth was a reasonable assumption for early humans; it's far from accurate.
Hilary's claim that the State Department told her this "95 percent" is NOT accurate; it's a lie, especially since she can't even name who from the Department supposedly told her this.