19 May '17 23:24>
Originally posted by SleepyguyHello, me
[youtube]1Uvt83YWWWY[/youtube]
Originally posted by twhiteheadI haven't told anyone they are too trusting of authority as much as I have encouraged people to test everything possible for themselves.
You YouTube nut oopsie daisies. The funny thing is, you keep telling people that they are too trusting of authority, yet you believe anything someone says on YouTube.
Originally posted by PonderableI realize it might be a bit taxing to expect anyone to sit through 4:51 of a video in order to get the gist of what is being presented, so allow me to provide the Clif Notes™ for you.
So the only point made is that they author confuses timing of pictures with time lapse?
Can you believe what foold post on youtube?
I can't.
Originally posted by FreakyKBHYour thread title suggests however that you endorse the contents of the video.
That being said, I don't consider it necessary to run a disclaimer on every link to any source stating a release from liability for every opinion or presentation made in the entirety of the information contained.
Originally posted by twhiteheadAh, so you're at a loss.
Your thread title suggests however that you endorse the contents of the video.
[b]If there is something with which you disagree in the linked video, or were you simply pursuing paths of insult?
Its complete bunk. The video creator doesn't understand the simple concept of perspective. He actually thinks the moon is constantly wiggling around.[/b]
Originally posted by FreakyKBHAh, so you have difficulty reading posts that contradict your world view.
Ah, so you're at a loss.
Originally posted by twhiteheadIf you wish to proceed with the conversation please state clearly:
Ah, so you have difficulty reading posts that contradict your world view.
Noted.
[b]It appears it escaped your notice that:
He posted his own time lapse which clearly shows the transition of the moon; and
He posted NASA's time lapse which shows a cartoonish moon with NO rotation at all.
It appears it escaped your notice that I responded directl ...[text shortened]... hat in the video you do actually agree with.
2. What in my response post you didn't understand.[/b]
Originally posted by KazetNagorraPerhaps you would care to do something against character and level a specific complaint?
Thousands of years ago, clever and ingenuous people were able to show, using a few simple instruments, that the Earth is round.
Thousands years later, Freaky gets easily tricked by the ramblings of methheads making amateuristic YouTube videos.
Originally posted by FreakyKBHSo can I take it that you a) agree with what he says about and b) do not have a reasonable explanation for any of these:
Boy, are you in luck!
Just a few posts above this post, I put the notes together regarding the salient point.