23 May '17 16:03>1 edit
Originally posted by sonhouseThat's an actual flat-earth belief? Wow.
It also destroys that poppycock about the moon being self illuminating.
Originally posted by vivifyI don't get it either but that is some of the poppycock they have come up with. I posted video's showing Earthshine on the moon during one of its phases but that is ignored also.
That's an actual flat-earth belief? Wow.
Originally posted by sonhouseTIL: Cleveland moved to Michigan.
I don't get it either but that is some of the poppycock they have come up with. I posted video's showing Earthshine on the moon during one of its phases but that is ignored also.
The amount of utter BS is staggering from those dudes.
Let's see. First off, humans have such an incredibly special significants to the gods that we get our own universe with ...[text shortened]... lpost and just takes that as a non-response. So it just goes into a big loop from that point on.
Originally posted by FreakyKBHWow, what a refutation my claim. If I am wrong about the aluminum foil cap set, show me where my analysis is wrong. The sun is NOT 3000 miles up and 50 miles across, the Moon is NOT self illuminating?
TIL: Cleveland moved to Michigan.
First, they give away the Browns, now, they give away my beloved city.
Talk about your all-time losers...
Originally posted by sonhouseI believe the topic of conversation was the video which described and then recorded several distant objects and the complete contradiction their observation created with respect to a round, pear-shaped earth.
Wow, what a refutation my claim. If I am wrong about the aluminum foil cap set, show me where my analysis is wrong. The sun is NOT 3000 miles up and 50 miles across, the Moon is NOT self illuminating?
Originally posted by FreakyKBHSo which is it, round or pear-shaped?
I believe the topic of conversation was the video which described and then recorded several distant objects and the complete contradiction their observation created with respect to a round, pear-shaped earth.
Did you have something on this topic?
Originally posted by FreakyKBHWell, we have all five.
Math which agrees.
Visual confirmation which does not rely on filters or alterations.
Moon phases which agree with the position of all three bodies.
Complete access to Antartica.
Compasses which agree with the curve.
I'm sure there's a few more, but that's a good start.
Originally posted by SuzianneWe have all five, and yet right out of the gate, Math Which Agrees, we stumble over the starting block.
Well, we have all five.
It's your indoctrination that keeps you from admitting or even seeing it. Your frankly insufficient knowledge of physics also doesn't help because you take absurd notions as givens. I'd say go back to school and take some science classes, but your insistence on staying comforted by your ignorance is just too satisfying for you to give up, even in the plain face of reality.
Originally posted by FreakyKBHYou have to know the math for horizons is only perfect on an AIRLESS WORLD. Like the moon. The math there would work EXACTLY because no air would modify the horizon issue. Here on Earth, the atmosphere blows the math away and makes it unreliable. Even YOU have to admit that.
We have all five, and yet right out of the gate, Math Which Agrees, we stumble over the starting block.
Case in point: Exhbit A, this thread.
Here is yet another example in a string of countless examples of the math expected on a spherical planet not being borne out with measurable reality.
That's what this thread is all about: we expect to have l ...[text shortened]... ng on my wholly unreliable analysis, I encourage you to read it for yourself to get up to speed.
Originally posted by sonhouseYou have to know the math for horizons is only perfect on an AIRLESS WORLD. Like the moon. The math there would work EXACTLY because no air would modify the horizon issue. Here on Earth, the atmosphere blows the math away and makes it unreliable. Even YOU have to admit that.
You have to know the math for horizons is only perfect on an AIRLESS WORLD. Like the moon. The math there would work EXACTLY because no air would modify the horizon issue. Here on Earth, the atmosphere blows the math away and makes it unreliable. Even YOU have to admit that.
And the compass issue, just exactly what do you mean by compass not pointing in ...[text shortened]... ers to say the sun is a few thousand miles up but in the atmosphere of Earth? Come on, get real.
Originally posted by FreakyKBHIt doesn't matter how close Flats think the sun is, if you think shadows upside down are because of a close sun it HAS to be under the clouds. Is there something you don't understand about that? And we are back to now airline pilots are in on the big conspiracy also. You just say you don't Know how close the sun is just closer than real people think but you can't even admit your completely bonker idea it would HAVE to be inside the atmosphere to do what you see in that photo. How many OTHER instances of that happening have you ever seen? I ask you again to give me a straight answer, why don't airline pilots see the sun maybe right in front of them or even below?
[b]You have to know the math for horizons is only perfect on an AIRLESS WORLD. Like the moon. The math there would work EXACTLY because no air would modify the horizon issue. Here on Earth, the atmosphere blows the math away and makes it unreliable. Even YOU have to admit that.
Oh, dear.
You’re back on the math?
Again?
After finally acknowledging t ...[text shortened]... real.[/b]
I’m all ears.
Essplain how this picture--- with the clouds described--- is possible.[/b]